GO KEVIN!
Kevin07 Website
Friday, November 2, 2007
Week 14 - Ethical journalism: Is it an oxymoron?
1. I think that I would go and see the source. It is a difficult question to answer. I think with any job there is always going to be unforseen costs, however perhaps not of this nature. Questions raising conflict of interest or bribery can be raised. Maybe if you communicated with this source on a personal level, you would find it hard not to print a biased article. However, the text states that, "the acceptance of gifts represents a ... widespread and insidious conflict of interest" (Conley & Lamble, 2006, p. 396).
2. A, "purist would say that no such trips should be taken unless the newspaper pays for it" (Conley & Lamble, 2006, p. 397). However, in this situaiton, it is important to be honest and to not use your position for personal gain (more trips in the future). The public has a right to know your opinion. As a journalist, perhaps you could let all companies willing to give you gifts know taht it does not buy goodwill or favourable coverage.
3. This is a difficult question to answer. As a student studying journalism, I would most probably run the correction piece, and cost myself the pay rise. However, as a journalist who is trying to work up in the world, I would probably print the smaller article. It may not be ethical, but it is an honest (I'm sure many journalists today would have done the same thing). It is fine to consider these situations in theory, but until you are put in the positions described, you can not be sure of how you would react.
4. This is also a difficult question to answer, and one that I am unsure of. Perhaps you could print the story and leave out the girl's name. Or perhaps there is a similar agreement you could come towards. This question is very dramatic and I sure it would not come up all too often.
------------------------------------------------------
Milk processors predicted to boost producer payments
Posted Thu Nov 1, 2007 1:49pm AEDT
The Department of Agriculture says Western Australia's milk processors will be forced to increase the amount they pay producers for milk this summer to maintain their supply base.
Milk processor Fonterra Australia will increase its price by about five cents a litre from January 1, 2008 until the end of June.
The department's John Lucey says he is pleased at least one milk processor is reacting to record high milk prices.
However, Mr Lucey says it is a competitive market and historically, when one processor increases its prices, the other processors generally follow suit.
"It's great that the processors are realising that if they want to have long-term dairy farmers supplying them, in this situation with the increase costs of summer feeding, they've had to increase their price to farmers," he said.
The Department of Agriculture says WA's milk processors will be forced to increase the amount they pay producers for milk to maintain their supply base.
---------------------------------------------------
This article is interesting to me as I drink ALOT of milk. I have never had soft drink, so all I really drink is milk and water.
Although it is only a raise by 5c per litre, you can see the drastic measures that the draught has caused, and its impact upon individual workers. Farmland is so harsh at the moment, and so difficult for farmers and produce.
The cost of groceries has risen so much. Living out of home, the costs of groceries are very important. As a university student, I am scraping together funds as it is.
Is it sad when Australian farmers, who are in a way the 'face' of Australia, are stuggling so badly. We are sheilding from their situation, and it is at times 'absence makes the heart forget'. Australian's should be showing more support for their farmers, we rely on them so much every day and barely realise it.
Suicide and depression are big issues concerning isolated individuals, especially males in rural environements. The drought, and added pressure for produce, would not be helping this issue. These are big problems, and add as another reason why farmers need as much support as they can from the Australian publics and governments.
This first paragraph is in a summary format. It has indicated the Who What Where and Why, and has left the When and How until the second paragraph. This article has been written in an inverted pyramid format, and could easily be chopped or added to.
2. A, "purist would say that no such trips should be taken unless the newspaper pays for it" (Conley & Lamble, 2006, p. 397). However, in this situaiton, it is important to be honest and to not use your position for personal gain (more trips in the future). The public has a right to know your opinion. As a journalist, perhaps you could let all companies willing to give you gifts know taht it does not buy goodwill or favourable coverage.
3. This is a difficult question to answer. As a student studying journalism, I would most probably run the correction piece, and cost myself the pay rise. However, as a journalist who is trying to work up in the world, I would probably print the smaller article. It may not be ethical, but it is an honest (I'm sure many journalists today would have done the same thing). It is fine to consider these situations in theory, but until you are put in the positions described, you can not be sure of how you would react.
4. This is also a difficult question to answer, and one that I am unsure of. Perhaps you could print the story and leave out the girl's name. Or perhaps there is a similar agreement you could come towards. This question is very dramatic and I sure it would not come up all too often.
------------------------------------------------------
Milk processors predicted to boost producer payments
Posted Thu Nov 1, 2007 1:49pm AEDT
The Department of Agriculture says Western Australia's milk processors will be forced to increase the amount they pay producers for milk this summer to maintain their supply base.
Milk processor Fonterra Australia will increase its price by about five cents a litre from January 1, 2008 until the end of June.
The department's John Lucey says he is pleased at least one milk processor is reacting to record high milk prices.
However, Mr Lucey says it is a competitive market and historically, when one processor increases its prices, the other processors generally follow suit.
"It's great that the processors are realising that if they want to have long-term dairy farmers supplying them, in this situation with the increase costs of summer feeding, they've had to increase their price to farmers," he said.
The Department of Agriculture says WA's milk processors will be forced to increase the amount they pay producers for milk to maintain their supply base.
---------------------------------------------------
This article is interesting to me as I drink ALOT of milk. I have never had soft drink, so all I really drink is milk and water.
Although it is only a raise by 5c per litre, you can see the drastic measures that the draught has caused, and its impact upon individual workers. Farmland is so harsh at the moment, and so difficult for farmers and produce.
The cost of groceries has risen so much. Living out of home, the costs of groceries are very important. As a university student, I am scraping together funds as it is.
Is it sad when Australian farmers, who are in a way the 'face' of Australia, are stuggling so badly. We are sheilding from their situation, and it is at times 'absence makes the heart forget'. Australian's should be showing more support for their farmers, we rely on them so much every day and barely realise it.
Suicide and depression are big issues concerning isolated individuals, especially males in rural environements. The drought, and added pressure for produce, would not be helping this issue. These are big problems, and add as another reason why farmers need as much support as they can from the Australian publics and governments.
This first paragraph is in a summary format. It has indicated the Who What Where and Why, and has left the When and How until the second paragraph. This article has been written in an inverted pyramid format, and could easily be chopped or added to.
Monday, October 22, 2007
Week 13 - Online news: Journalism's strands converge + Perils of Defamation
Journalism's Strands Converge
1. I think a lot of training and preparation would be needed before media companies can expect their journalists to work in converged news rooms. However, "the idea of journalists trying to be all things to all media at once is a fallacy" (Conley & Lamble, 2006, p. 300). I personally think that convergence can be done, as it has done with Media General, successfully. Convergence allows for a huge range of possibilities for journalists. However, some people may not feel comfortable working in a broadcasting media, and prefer print or newspaper reporting. This would put a lot of pressure on staff. However, many journalists already are working in a convergence media, although this generally applies to similar mediums such as newspaper and online.
2. I think the likely outcome would be that the person would either accept their situation, and try to learn the skills needed for television reporting, or would resign and find a non convergence media company. However, I think in this situation, if the person felt extremely uncomfortable, then it would be silly to push them and in turn lose a good employee. There is nothing wrong with becoming a specialist in one media format. By pushing someone into a format they are not comfortable with, the medium will suffer.
3. I am unsure about this question as some new technologies having really taken off, and some have not. Convergence media will generally only be available to the mega media companies, as they will have the resources to support the huge conglomerate. In terms of low-scale convergence, I think many media formats may consider converging with one other, as many have already done with print and the web, or Radio and print. For example, Triple J radio station releases a 'J Mag', a monthly magazine. Or Sydney Morning Herald Online and the newspaper.
4. More relaxed cross-media ownership laws will most probably only result in more publications going online. Nearly every company, or even person, has a web site. The text book states, "If the keep giving away their news free on the web ... they will go broke" (Conley & Lamble, 2006, p. 312). I disagree with this statement. I always look at the ABC news website, and this does not deter me from watching the ABC news broadcast or purchaing a newspaper.
5. I think all mediums will still hold their value among society. All mediums have their own place, their own positives and negatives, and have tailored themselves to suit their mediums. Perhaps the only difference would be that everything would be personally sent to a mobile phone-like device whenever you wanted it. The web will always continue to grow and grow.Who knows with technology. I know that I would personally be very disappointed if even one of the mediums was not around.
6. I think the universities are already promoting a certain level of multi-skilling. In the journalism course at Newcastle University, broadcast journalism, magazine journalism & print journalism are all offered. There is always the option of an elective, opening up a whole new level of possibilities.
7. I think society is very reliant on computers, technology and the web, but I do not think they are getting to the point where they could not survive without it. The web offers so much information that would never be available to us without it. It is a huge technological advance, and should not always be looked at in a negative light. Society has adapted to the technology and is using it to their advantage. Ever if society did reach the point where they could not live without it, I do not think this is such a dramatic issue. Points concerning socialisation and interpersonal skills are highly valid, but I am addressing this question from a professional point of view, not a social.
PERILS OF DEFAMATION
1. I think in a situation like this it is of great value to seek professional legal help. I think in this case you should also contact your editors or senior work colleages. A defamation civil case is something to avoid at all costs. The text states that a newspaper should, "offer the defamed person a chance to put their side" (Conley & Lamble, 2006, p. 422). I think in this case what the person requires is a little more extreme then just putting their side across. Maybe you could have a meeting with the person and come to some sort of agreement that allows for an article to be published, but not an extravaganza. This would be too costly for the newspaper.
2. No, I think everyone should abide by the same laws and have to deal with the consequences. Giving different people different powers would never work. Having a universal defamation law in Australia is sufficient. Even though these public figures are often role models, and do have a responsibility in society, they should not lose their defamation rights.
3. This is a difficult situation. If you report your whistle blower, you are going against your journalistic code of ethics. However if you do not then the newspaper will be sued. There is also the issue of withholding information. If you have taken clear, accurate notes of your source, then these may be used in a courtroom.
-------------------------------------------------
Hundreds protest Puerto Rican 'pet massacre'
Posted Mon Oct 22, 2007 10:00am AEST
Hundreds of people, angered over an alleged "pet massacre" in Puerto Rico's north-west town of Barceloneta, joined in a protest march from the island's Supreme Court to its Capital.
Many in the crowd of about 500 brought dogs and wore T-shirts reading, "I'm an animal lover" or "I love mutts." Others held signs with slogans like "Stop animal abuse" and "Justice for the pets of Barceloneta."
The October 8 and October 10 raids, in which authorities seized around 80 pets from their owners at three public housing projects in Barceloneta, stirred widespread anger.
Residents say many of the animals were later thrown off the 15-metre Paseo del Indio highway bridge outside the town to their deaths.
"I'm here because we have to stop the abuse against dogs and other animals," said dog owner Mari Luz Santiago.
Fellow protester Ramon Martinez added, "If what they say is true, that's an action that's unfitting for any civilised country."
Mayor Sol Luis Fontanes ordered the raids after instituting a no-pet policy at the projects, though commonwealth and federal housing officials say they had no rules barring pets.
Forty-five residents filed a $US22.5 million federal lawsuit on Friday against the town, the Public Housing Administration, the owner of an animal control company and several others.
The suit claims at least 50 of the pets were beaten, drugged and then thrown to their deaths from the bridge.
Animal Control Solutions President Julio Diaz, whose company was contracted by the municipality, said municipal officials delivered the pets to his firm, which then euthanised the animals humanely.
Mr Diaz said many pet corpses below the bridge were decomposed and probably killed before the raids, but some residents told of rescuing pet survivors and identifying bodies.
---------------------------------------------------
This article is very upsetting for me. All I can hope is that President Julio Diaz is correct, and that the animals were enthanised humanely.
This raised the question of, why were these pets taken away in the first place? Was it the people living in the public housings' fault? Or was it over a dispute? Either way, it is very wrong for innocent animals to suffer.
As an animal lover, I think that animals deserve to die with dignity. Throwing an animal off a bridge is a serious offence. Hopefully Animal Rights groups will be able to assess the situation in Peurto Rico, and take action.
The fact that there was a huge protest leads me to believe that an ill action was taken, and that there is geniune need for such measures to be taken. I am not sure how effectively animal owners would be able to identify decomposed bodies, but if they are able to then this is a complete outrage.
This raises other issues concerning the rights of animals, such as animal testing. This is a very tough subject, however I do applaud companies that actively dismiss animal testing, such as The Body Shop or Red Earth. These natural products are, in my opinion, much better.
Each state and territory has different laws governing the welface of aniamls, however animal testing is not illegal.
The Body Shop Link
The Body Shop
Act Now Animal Testing
Act Now
Puerto Rico protests (watch without the sound)
1. I think a lot of training and preparation would be needed before media companies can expect their journalists to work in converged news rooms. However, "the idea of journalists trying to be all things to all media at once is a fallacy" (Conley & Lamble, 2006, p. 300). I personally think that convergence can be done, as it has done with Media General, successfully. Convergence allows for a huge range of possibilities for journalists. However, some people may not feel comfortable working in a broadcasting media, and prefer print or newspaper reporting. This would put a lot of pressure on staff. However, many journalists already are working in a convergence media, although this generally applies to similar mediums such as newspaper and online.
2. I think the likely outcome would be that the person would either accept their situation, and try to learn the skills needed for television reporting, or would resign and find a non convergence media company. However, I think in this situation, if the person felt extremely uncomfortable, then it would be silly to push them and in turn lose a good employee. There is nothing wrong with becoming a specialist in one media format. By pushing someone into a format they are not comfortable with, the medium will suffer.
3. I am unsure about this question as some new technologies having really taken off, and some have not. Convergence media will generally only be available to the mega media companies, as they will have the resources to support the huge conglomerate. In terms of low-scale convergence, I think many media formats may consider converging with one other, as many have already done with print and the web, or Radio and print. For example, Triple J radio station releases a 'J Mag', a monthly magazine. Or Sydney Morning Herald Online and the newspaper.
4. More relaxed cross-media ownership laws will most probably only result in more publications going online. Nearly every company, or even person, has a web site. The text book states, "If the keep giving away their news free on the web ... they will go broke" (Conley & Lamble, 2006, p. 312). I disagree with this statement. I always look at the ABC news website, and this does not deter me from watching the ABC news broadcast or purchaing a newspaper.
5. I think all mediums will still hold their value among society. All mediums have their own place, their own positives and negatives, and have tailored themselves to suit their mediums. Perhaps the only difference would be that everything would be personally sent to a mobile phone-like device whenever you wanted it. The web will always continue to grow and grow.Who knows with technology. I know that I would personally be very disappointed if even one of the mediums was not around.
6. I think the universities are already promoting a certain level of multi-skilling. In the journalism course at Newcastle University, broadcast journalism, magazine journalism & print journalism are all offered. There is always the option of an elective, opening up a whole new level of possibilities.
7. I think society is very reliant on computers, technology and the web, but I do not think they are getting to the point where they could not survive without it. The web offers so much information that would never be available to us without it. It is a huge technological advance, and should not always be looked at in a negative light. Society has adapted to the technology and is using it to their advantage. Ever if society did reach the point where they could not live without it, I do not think this is such a dramatic issue. Points concerning socialisation and interpersonal skills are highly valid, but I am addressing this question from a professional point of view, not a social.
PERILS OF DEFAMATION
1. I think in a situation like this it is of great value to seek professional legal help. I think in this case you should also contact your editors or senior work colleages. A defamation civil case is something to avoid at all costs. The text states that a newspaper should, "offer the defamed person a chance to put their side" (Conley & Lamble, 2006, p. 422). I think in this case what the person requires is a little more extreme then just putting their side across. Maybe you could have a meeting with the person and come to some sort of agreement that allows for an article to be published, but not an extravaganza. This would be too costly for the newspaper.
2. No, I think everyone should abide by the same laws and have to deal with the consequences. Giving different people different powers would never work. Having a universal defamation law in Australia is sufficient. Even though these public figures are often role models, and do have a responsibility in society, they should not lose their defamation rights.
3. This is a difficult situation. If you report your whistle blower, you are going against your journalistic code of ethics. However if you do not then the newspaper will be sued. There is also the issue of withholding information. If you have taken clear, accurate notes of your source, then these may be used in a courtroom.
-------------------------------------------------
Hundreds protest Puerto Rican 'pet massacre'
Posted Mon Oct 22, 2007 10:00am AEST
Hundreds of people, angered over an alleged "pet massacre" in Puerto Rico's north-west town of Barceloneta, joined in a protest march from the island's Supreme Court to its Capital.
Many in the crowd of about 500 brought dogs and wore T-shirts reading, "I'm an animal lover" or "I love mutts." Others held signs with slogans like "Stop animal abuse" and "Justice for the pets of Barceloneta."
The October 8 and October 10 raids, in which authorities seized around 80 pets from their owners at three public housing projects in Barceloneta, stirred widespread anger.
Residents say many of the animals were later thrown off the 15-metre Paseo del Indio highway bridge outside the town to their deaths.
"I'm here because we have to stop the abuse against dogs and other animals," said dog owner Mari Luz Santiago.
Fellow protester Ramon Martinez added, "If what they say is true, that's an action that's unfitting for any civilised country."
Mayor Sol Luis Fontanes ordered the raids after instituting a no-pet policy at the projects, though commonwealth and federal housing officials say they had no rules barring pets.
Forty-five residents filed a $US22.5 million federal lawsuit on Friday against the town, the Public Housing Administration, the owner of an animal control company and several others.
The suit claims at least 50 of the pets were beaten, drugged and then thrown to their deaths from the bridge.
Animal Control Solutions President Julio Diaz, whose company was contracted by the municipality, said municipal officials delivered the pets to his firm, which then euthanised the animals humanely.
Mr Diaz said many pet corpses below the bridge were decomposed and probably killed before the raids, but some residents told of rescuing pet survivors and identifying bodies.
---------------------------------------------------
This article is very upsetting for me. All I can hope is that President Julio Diaz is correct, and that the animals were enthanised humanely.
This raised the question of, why were these pets taken away in the first place? Was it the people living in the public housings' fault? Or was it over a dispute? Either way, it is very wrong for innocent animals to suffer.
As an animal lover, I think that animals deserve to die with dignity. Throwing an animal off a bridge is a serious offence. Hopefully Animal Rights groups will be able to assess the situation in Peurto Rico, and take action.
The fact that there was a huge protest leads me to believe that an ill action was taken, and that there is geniune need for such measures to be taken. I am not sure how effectively animal owners would be able to identify decomposed bodies, but if they are able to then this is a complete outrage.
This raises other issues concerning the rights of animals, such as animal testing. This is a very tough subject, however I do applaud companies that actively dismiss animal testing, such as The Body Shop or Red Earth. These natural products are, in my opinion, much better.
Each state and territory has different laws governing the welface of aniamls, however animal testing is not illegal.
The Body Shop Link
The Body Shop
Act Now Animal Testing
Act Now
Puerto Rico protests (watch without the sound)
Friday, October 12, 2007
Week 12 - Broadcast Journalism: The world's town crier
Broadcast Journalism: the world's town crier
1. I think the ABC should not become privatized. The poll in 2004, in Conley & Lamble, showed that the ABC is the second most trusted organization in Australia. As long as Australia remains in public hands it will continue to be accountable to no one but its own staff.
"As long as politicians control funding, the ABC probably always will be perceived to be under some form of government pressure" (Conley & Lamble, p. 269). This statement is very true. Although, as with John Howards act of cutting 10% of ABC funding after a debate against the opposition was hosted by Kerry O'Brien, I wonder if this was more damaging to Howard's approval ratings than to the ABC.
2. I think I would interview both applicants and decide on who had the most passion for the job, however I am swaying towards the female candidate. It is wrong to, "value beauty over brains in its journalists" (Conley & Lamble, p. 288). As the female is more experienced, she will most probably be a better news reporter, yet once this also hinges on how passionate they are and how comfortable they are in front of a camera.
3. Radio - A Negative aspect is that it is frequently claimed by media critics to be 'over the line into entertainment'. Stories sometimes unable to sink in.
Positives is that radio is a warm, emotional medium of the imagination. Often can be the first to release a story.
Television - A Negative is that sometimes it is viewed as only providing the 'tip of the iceberg' of news stories. Another is that stories are sometimes unable to sink in. Stories may be rejected because they are "video poor".
Positives is that it can show footage and has strong, lasting qualities. Can seek 'common denominators' that appeal to most viewers.
Newspaper - Story is able to sink in. Can fully cover a story.
Negative is that it is always a day late.
Web - Stories can often be "just in" or the first to broadcast
Can be seen as lacking in credibility
I think the best communicators are either newspaper or television, even though all formats hold their own values. When reading a newspaper, I am able to think about the words on the page and form opinions and questions in my mind. I am able to receive a lot of information concerning the incident. However, television is a very strong medium with the cutting edge in timeliness over newspapers. Television is also able to show footage.
4. The last federal campaign, or I will concentrate on this campaign, is focusing more on personalities rather than issues. Each side tries to personally cut down the other, to the extent of airing information concerning Kevin Rudd's heart operation many years ago. Really, voters should be listening to their policies and debates rather then looking at the faces of the parties.
---------------------------------------------------
Little change for DOCS in child deaths review
Posted Wed Oct 24, 2007 10:08am AEST Updated Wed Oct 24, 2007 10:20am AEST
The New South Wales ombudsman's annual report confirms there has been little change in the number of children who have died after concerns about them were reported to the Department of Community Services (DOCS).
A spokeswoman for ombudsman Bruce Barbour has confirmed this year's report, due to be released on Friday, will show the office has reviewed more than 100 child deaths.
The report will come on the same day a memorial service is held for Dean Shillingsworth, the two-year-old whose body was found dumped in a suitcase in Sydney's south-west.
DOCS admitted earlier this week it knew of Dean's family and the department is now being investigated to see if it could have acted differently.
Opposition community services spokeswoman Katrina Hodgkinson has seized on the figures, saying it is evidence of the NSW Government's failings.
"It follows on from the previous year where 109 deaths were occasioned for children who had been notified to the Department of Community Services that they were at risk," she said.
"It continues to be a trend and it's unacceptable to the people of NSW that this trend continues."
Last year's investigation into reviewable child deaths found most had a history of contact with DOCS.
Dean's father released
The father of Dean Shillingsworth has been released from jail in time for his son's memorial service.
Paul Shillingsworth has been in Junee prison in the state's south-east after breaching parole.
The NSW Parole Board met yesterday and decided to release Mr Shillingsworth.
It is understood Mr Shillingsworth will travel to Sydney after being collected by relatives.
There are reports both sides of the boy's family are fighting over where his funeral should take place.
----------------------------------------------------------------
It seems no matter what DOCS do, they are always wrong.
Before I began my studies of communication, all I wanted to be was a social worker, most probably working for DOCS. My mother actively discouraged me from following this career path saying that I would be unable to leave my job out of my personal life. And right now, I can see I made the right decision.
DOCS is overloaded with so many cases, they are constantly struggling. To use a tragic situation, such as that of the young boy who was found murdered in a suitcase, to try and attack opposing governments is appauling.
I agree in that it is unacceptable that the trend continue, so perhaps some more power could be installed to the social workers at DOCS. At present, if they act on a situation they believe is unacceptable, they are crucified by both the public and the media for breach of privacy and can be charged. If they are successful in rescuing children, they have such little power that the child will often be returned to the incompetent parents. I know this personally. If they do nothing, it is even worse.
Society and the media need to get behind DOCS, they deal with terrible situations every day. They are doing a job that many people would dread doing. I have a lot of respect for them.
Link to DOCS website:
DOCS Website
1. I think the ABC should not become privatized. The poll in 2004, in Conley & Lamble, showed that the ABC is the second most trusted organization in Australia. As long as Australia remains in public hands it will continue to be accountable to no one but its own staff.
"As long as politicians control funding, the ABC probably always will be perceived to be under some form of government pressure" (Conley & Lamble, p. 269). This statement is very true. Although, as with John Howards act of cutting 10% of ABC funding after a debate against the opposition was hosted by Kerry O'Brien, I wonder if this was more damaging to Howard's approval ratings than to the ABC.
2. I think I would interview both applicants and decide on who had the most passion for the job, however I am swaying towards the female candidate. It is wrong to, "value beauty over brains in its journalists" (Conley & Lamble, p. 288). As the female is more experienced, she will most probably be a better news reporter, yet once this also hinges on how passionate they are and how comfortable they are in front of a camera.
3. Radio - A Negative aspect is that it is frequently claimed by media critics to be 'over the line into entertainment'. Stories sometimes unable to sink in.
Positives is that radio is a warm, emotional medium of the imagination. Often can be the first to release a story.
Television - A Negative is that sometimes it is viewed as only providing the 'tip of the iceberg' of news stories. Another is that stories are sometimes unable to sink in. Stories may be rejected because they are "video poor".
Positives is that it can show footage and has strong, lasting qualities. Can seek 'common denominators' that appeal to most viewers.
Newspaper - Story is able to sink in. Can fully cover a story.
Negative is that it is always a day late.
Web - Stories can often be "just in" or the first to broadcast
Can be seen as lacking in credibility
I think the best communicators are either newspaper or television, even though all formats hold their own values. When reading a newspaper, I am able to think about the words on the page and form opinions and questions in my mind. I am able to receive a lot of information concerning the incident. However, television is a very strong medium with the cutting edge in timeliness over newspapers. Television is also able to show footage.
4. The last federal campaign, or I will concentrate on this campaign, is focusing more on personalities rather than issues. Each side tries to personally cut down the other, to the extent of airing information concerning Kevin Rudd's heart operation many years ago. Really, voters should be listening to their policies and debates rather then looking at the faces of the parties.
---------------------------------------------------
Little change for DOCS in child deaths review
Posted Wed Oct 24, 2007 10:08am AEST Updated Wed Oct 24, 2007 10:20am AEST
The New South Wales ombudsman's annual report confirms there has been little change in the number of children who have died after concerns about them were reported to the Department of Community Services (DOCS).
A spokeswoman for ombudsman Bruce Barbour has confirmed this year's report, due to be released on Friday, will show the office has reviewed more than 100 child deaths.
The report will come on the same day a memorial service is held for Dean Shillingsworth, the two-year-old whose body was found dumped in a suitcase in Sydney's south-west.
DOCS admitted earlier this week it knew of Dean's family and the department is now being investigated to see if it could have acted differently.
Opposition community services spokeswoman Katrina Hodgkinson has seized on the figures, saying it is evidence of the NSW Government's failings.
"It follows on from the previous year where 109 deaths were occasioned for children who had been notified to the Department of Community Services that they were at risk," she said.
"It continues to be a trend and it's unacceptable to the people of NSW that this trend continues."
Last year's investigation into reviewable child deaths found most had a history of contact with DOCS.
Dean's father released
The father of Dean Shillingsworth has been released from jail in time for his son's memorial service.
Paul Shillingsworth has been in Junee prison in the state's south-east after breaching parole.
The NSW Parole Board met yesterday and decided to release Mr Shillingsworth.
It is understood Mr Shillingsworth will travel to Sydney after being collected by relatives.
There are reports both sides of the boy's family are fighting over where his funeral should take place.
----------------------------------------------------------------
It seems no matter what DOCS do, they are always wrong.
Before I began my studies of communication, all I wanted to be was a social worker, most probably working for DOCS. My mother actively discouraged me from following this career path saying that I would be unable to leave my job out of my personal life. And right now, I can see I made the right decision.
DOCS is overloaded with so many cases, they are constantly struggling. To use a tragic situation, such as that of the young boy who was found murdered in a suitcase, to try and attack opposing governments is appauling.
I agree in that it is unacceptable that the trend continue, so perhaps some more power could be installed to the social workers at DOCS. At present, if they act on a situation they believe is unacceptable, they are crucified by both the public and the media for breach of privacy and can be charged. If they are successful in rescuing children, they have such little power that the child will often be returned to the incompetent parents. I know this personally. If they do nothing, it is even worse.
Society and the media need to get behind DOCS, they deal with terrible situations every day. They are doing a job that many people would dread doing. I have a lot of respect for them.
Link to DOCS website:
DOCS Website
Thursday, September 27, 2007
Week 11 - Reporting for Duty
Reporting for Duty
1. I would most probably run the story. However, this would evoke discrimination from the police, and may result in being left out from getting crime stories. Although contacts are highly important to journalists, what is in the public interest is paramount. If the discrimination occurs, it can, "motivate a meeting between the editor and senior police" (Conley & Lamble, p. 244). If a policeman is found to be corrupt, then other, honest policemen would want him to pay for his unjust actions. Although, some protection must be put in place for whistle blowers. This raises a whole new set of rules and regulations. One large story was that of the journalists who got given court sentences as they would not uncover their sources because it was against the journalistic code of ethics.
2. This is a difficult question to answer and can most probably not be answered correctly until I was put in that position. On the one hand you could report the story, as you have a duty to the newspaper and public to report all such incidents. You are protected from charges of defamation or contempt in such cases, provided you are accurate and fairly represent the evidence. They must also cover both sides if both were presented in court.
On the other hand, it is an ethical and legal issue. Perhaps you could contact a mental health institute or the police. I would be very unsure of where to go from in a case such as this.
3. I would report the case. Not only would it be a large story, but a journalist has a duty to the public to report all such findings. It would also be a huge scoop. People in the public eye, although are most probably under a lot of stress, must follow the same legal system as everybody else. It is their responsibility to abide by it accordingly. It would also be insulting to a credible journalist to be offered such rewards.
4. I think it would be important to contact legal advice as soon as possible. If there is any chance that this is true, I would protect the identity of my whistle blower, as it is in line with the journalistic code of ethics. I would not run a story concerning the issue as I could be charged with, "scandalising the court" (Conley & Lamble, 2006, p. 247). If you are charged with this, you are guilty until proven innocent, a reversal of normal rules.
Family First candidate dumped over internet photos
Posted Mon Oct 29, 2007 7:42am AEDT
Updated Mon Oct 29, 2007 9:01am AEDT
Family First has dumped one of its election candidates over compromising photographs that have surfaced on the internet.
A party spokeswoman says Andrew Quah has been disendorsed and expelled from the party because he "does not share the party's values".
One of the three photographs appears to show Mr Quah exposing himself.
Today's Sydney Morning Herald quotes Mr Quah as saying that his "political enemies" may have drugged him to force him to pose for the photos.
But he denies his genitals are shown on the photo, saying someone may have photoshopped them in to the shot.
Family First wants to make it harder to access pornography on the internet and Mr Quah says that in the past he has questioned the feasibility of doing so.
Mr Quah was a candidate for the seat of Reid in mid-western suburbs of Sydney.
Family First says another candidate will be chosen in the next few days.
-----------------------------------------------------
I really wonder about public figures sometimes. But this article has really incited more worry! This is a complete oxymoron of the party's policy, and has been embarrassing for everyone involved, especially Mr Quah.
Situations like this serve as huge reality checks to the rest of society - these politicans or public figures are human, just like you and me. Another time when a reality check has been served was the incident involving Kevin Rudd at 'Scores', a strip-club. We, and sometimes the media, tend to put these people up on pedestools, and expect them to be seamless. Their parties also expect this of them, especially when they are the face.
This article was timed so badly, the government released all that information concerning safety on the internet to all houses, and then this arises. Mr Quah would definitely be regretting his decisions. Blaming his actions on "political enemies" who may have drugged him to pose for photos is so feeble that he really should have made no comment rather than this.
I wonder if any more interesting information will surface about our political leaders in the weeks moving closer to the election.
Family first link:
http://www.familyfirst.org.au/
One funny photo:
This is unrelated to my article, but I still find it hilarius!
1. I would most probably run the story. However, this would evoke discrimination from the police, and may result in being left out from getting crime stories. Although contacts are highly important to journalists, what is in the public interest is paramount. If the discrimination occurs, it can, "motivate a meeting between the editor and senior police" (Conley & Lamble, p. 244). If a policeman is found to be corrupt, then other, honest policemen would want him to pay for his unjust actions. Although, some protection must be put in place for whistle blowers. This raises a whole new set of rules and regulations. One large story was that of the journalists who got given court sentences as they would not uncover their sources because it was against the journalistic code of ethics.
2. This is a difficult question to answer and can most probably not be answered correctly until I was put in that position. On the one hand you could report the story, as you have a duty to the newspaper and public to report all such incidents. You are protected from charges of defamation or contempt in such cases, provided you are accurate and fairly represent the evidence. They must also cover both sides if both were presented in court.
On the other hand, it is an ethical and legal issue. Perhaps you could contact a mental health institute or the police. I would be very unsure of where to go from in a case such as this.
3. I would report the case. Not only would it be a large story, but a journalist has a duty to the public to report all such findings. It would also be a huge scoop. People in the public eye, although are most probably under a lot of stress, must follow the same legal system as everybody else. It is their responsibility to abide by it accordingly. It would also be insulting to a credible journalist to be offered such rewards.
4. I think it would be important to contact legal advice as soon as possible. If there is any chance that this is true, I would protect the identity of my whistle blower, as it is in line with the journalistic code of ethics. I would not run a story concerning the issue as I could be charged with, "scandalising the court" (Conley & Lamble, 2006, p. 247). If you are charged with this, you are guilty until proven innocent, a reversal of normal rules.
Family First candidate dumped over internet photos
Posted Mon Oct 29, 2007 7:42am AEDT
Updated Mon Oct 29, 2007 9:01am AEDT
Family First has dumped one of its election candidates over compromising photographs that have surfaced on the internet.
A party spokeswoman says Andrew Quah has been disendorsed and expelled from the party because he "does not share the party's values".
One of the three photographs appears to show Mr Quah exposing himself.
Today's Sydney Morning Herald quotes Mr Quah as saying that his "political enemies" may have drugged him to force him to pose for the photos.
But he denies his genitals are shown on the photo, saying someone may have photoshopped them in to the shot.
Family First wants to make it harder to access pornography on the internet and Mr Quah says that in the past he has questioned the feasibility of doing so.
Mr Quah was a candidate for the seat of Reid in mid-western suburbs of Sydney.
Family First says another candidate will be chosen in the next few days.
-----------------------------------------------------
I really wonder about public figures sometimes. But this article has really incited more worry! This is a complete oxymoron of the party's policy, and has been embarrassing for everyone involved, especially Mr Quah.
Situations like this serve as huge reality checks to the rest of society - these politicans or public figures are human, just like you and me. Another time when a reality check has been served was the incident involving Kevin Rudd at 'Scores', a strip-club. We, and sometimes the media, tend to put these people up on pedestools, and expect them to be seamless. Their parties also expect this of them, especially when they are the face.
This article was timed so badly, the government released all that information concerning safety on the internet to all houses, and then this arises. Mr Quah would definitely be regretting his decisions. Blaming his actions on "political enemies" who may have drugged him to pose for photos is so feeble that he really should have made no comment rather than this.
I wonder if any more interesting information will surface about our political leaders in the weeks moving closer to the election.
Family first link:
http://www.familyfirst.org.au/
One funny photo:
This is unrelated to my article, but I still find it hilarius!
Week 10 - The Story Factor
The Story Factor
1. I would most probably run with the story, as if another media outlet publishes the story the day after, it can negatively effect them. Although I would know that the story would most probably be written at a better standard if it was a day after, wouldn't a lot of stories have that same problem? I would simply have to just write it to the best of my ability. If the source would rather the information be left until the next day, I would have to explain to them my situation. And, why would they have brought up this information unless they wanted it to be printed or revealed?
2. This is a tough situation, with your personal ethical standpoints coming into serious play. I would find this decision to be very daunting. Although it is very much in the public interest to know about this situation, as several guests and staff have become ill, there is the fact that 120 jobs may be risked. I am leaning towards publishing the story, as it is the responsibility of the kitchen to be health-orientated and to not be in these conditions. With already so many incidents, the kitchen would surely not survive in today's standards of cleanliness.
3. I would find this source to be very untrustworthy and would be very hesitant to follow off his comments. As I have no experience in the journalism industry, this question is difficult to answer as there is probably a code or steps to follow when an incident such as this occurs, or relating to sources.
4. I would be unsure of what to do in the situation. As a junior journalist, it would be a very difficult decision to make. An editor's opinion would be highly regarded as they know the newspaper well and know how to angle a story. The policeman, although probably experienced when dealing with journalists, is still a policeman who does not work at your newspaper. Although, maintaining contacts in important. Perhaps further research of the story would make for a meet somewhere in the middle.
---------------------------------------------------------
UN envoy arrives in Burma amid further protests
Posted Sat Sep 29, 2007 8:12pm AEST Updated Sat Sep 29, 2007 9:40pm AEST
Just before the arrival of the UN envoy, protesters again took to the streets (AFP)
• Related Story: Burma death toll much higher than reported: Downer
• Related Story: Japanese Minister heading to Burma
• Related Story: Satellites show Karen villages burnt in Burma
The United Nations special envoy, Ibrahim Gambari, has arrived in Burma to try to persuade the military authorities to end the suppression of the pro-democracy movement.
Just before his arrival, protesters again took to the streets of Rangoon.
After landing in Burma's largest city, Mr Gambari left immediately for the country's isolated administrative capital, Naypidaw, where he is expected to meet top junta leaders.
There were small groups of protesters on the streets today, with security forces charging a crowd of about 100 in the centre of Burma's main city Rangoon, beating many of them and arresting five, witnesses said.
The group had gathered on the Pansoedan bridge in downtown Rangoon and as soon as they started to clap their hands, the security forces swooped and began attacking them, they said.
"They beat people so badly, I wonder how these people can bear it," said one Rangoon resident who witnessed the scene.
"I saw the security forces arrest about five people on the streets."
The small protest was the first to be held in Rangoon today, as an overwhelming security operation successfully choked off daily rallies that yesterday attracted 10,000 and tens of thousands earlier in the week.
UN secretary general Ban Ki Moon has called on the Burmese Government to commit to a path of peaceful national reconciliation.
Global pressure on the military regime to halt the crackdown on demonstrations has intensified.
Members of the protest movement vowed to come out on the streets again Saturday, despite a three-day offensive by security forces that has left at least 13 dead and hundreds more jailed.
"We are ready to go to town again. We will start it all over again and we are very hopeful that things will become much more intense as the hours go by," one pro-democracy campaigner involved in the protests said.
Dr Gambari's itinerary has not been released, but on previous visits he has met with regime leader Senior General Than Shwe, and once with opposition activist Aung San Suu Kyi, who has been under house arrest for most of the past 18 years.
The United States has urged the country's leaders to let Mr Gambari meet with anyone he wishes, including Aung San Suu Kyi.
Back online
Internet access has been restored to Burma, a day after the main internet link was cut off to stop reports and pictures of a crackdown on pro-democracy demonstrations reaching the outside world.
Internet users inside Burma are now able to see domestic Web pages as well as send e-mails outside the country.
Pictures and video footage sent to the international media by Burmese protesters have fuelled global condemnation of the government's actions.
Earlier, witnesses said soldiers were beating and arresting people found with mobile phones or cameras.
Food aid stalled
Meanwhile the World Food Program is having trouble delivering food to the hundreds of thousands of people it supports in Burma because of the latest unrest.
Program spokesman Greg Barrow says it is now getting very difficult to move food around.
"At the moment, we're trying to feed around half a million [people] and all of them are potentially affected if this goes on for a long time," he said.
"I think you have to realise that when you have a big food assistance operation, there's a long chain of movement going on there, and if one link in that chain is disrupted it has a knock-on effect down the line."
-------------------------------------------------
This is such a terrible situation. Reading articles such as these evoked a lot of strong, emotional feelings. The situation in Burma is terrible, with people coming to such measures to try and combat their government.
"They beat people so badly, I wonder how these people can bear it," said one Rangoon resident who witnessed the scene. - This line is probably the saddest. The way people are being treated in Burma is appauling. It makes me realise how lucky we are to be living in a democracy, and in such a fortunate country as Australia.
One incident of a photographer being shot at point-blank distance was high on the media's agenda. They had direct footage of the incident, which effectively communicated the true magnitude of not only the armed forces, but of the completely biased Burmese media, who inappropriately said that forces were dealing with protesters accordingly.
The second of this article relating to food aid is very disturbing and worrying. The people of Burma are affected on so many levels.
I really hope that peace is restored in Burma, and that negotiations with the UN are definitely underway.
Some interesting links are:
Photos of Burmese Protests
The Telegraph (UK)
1. I would most probably run with the story, as if another media outlet publishes the story the day after, it can negatively effect them. Although I would know that the story would most probably be written at a better standard if it was a day after, wouldn't a lot of stories have that same problem? I would simply have to just write it to the best of my ability. If the source would rather the information be left until the next day, I would have to explain to them my situation. And, why would they have brought up this information unless they wanted it to be printed or revealed?
2. This is a tough situation, with your personal ethical standpoints coming into serious play. I would find this decision to be very daunting. Although it is very much in the public interest to know about this situation, as several guests and staff have become ill, there is the fact that 120 jobs may be risked. I am leaning towards publishing the story, as it is the responsibility of the kitchen to be health-orientated and to not be in these conditions. With already so many incidents, the kitchen would surely not survive in today's standards of cleanliness.
3. I would find this source to be very untrustworthy and would be very hesitant to follow off his comments. As I have no experience in the journalism industry, this question is difficult to answer as there is probably a code or steps to follow when an incident such as this occurs, or relating to sources.
4. I would be unsure of what to do in the situation. As a junior journalist, it would be a very difficult decision to make. An editor's opinion would be highly regarded as they know the newspaper well and know how to angle a story. The policeman, although probably experienced when dealing with journalists, is still a policeman who does not work at your newspaper. Although, maintaining contacts in important. Perhaps further research of the story would make for a meet somewhere in the middle.
---------------------------------------------------------
UN envoy arrives in Burma amid further protests
Posted Sat Sep 29, 2007 8:12pm AEST Updated Sat Sep 29, 2007 9:40pm AEST
Just before the arrival of the UN envoy, protesters again took to the streets (AFP)
• Related Story: Burma death toll much higher than reported: Downer
• Related Story: Japanese Minister heading to Burma
• Related Story: Satellites show Karen villages burnt in Burma
The United Nations special envoy, Ibrahim Gambari, has arrived in Burma to try to persuade the military authorities to end the suppression of the pro-democracy movement.
Just before his arrival, protesters again took to the streets of Rangoon.
After landing in Burma's largest city, Mr Gambari left immediately for the country's isolated administrative capital, Naypidaw, where he is expected to meet top junta leaders.
There were small groups of protesters on the streets today, with security forces charging a crowd of about 100 in the centre of Burma's main city Rangoon, beating many of them and arresting five, witnesses said.
The group had gathered on the Pansoedan bridge in downtown Rangoon and as soon as they started to clap their hands, the security forces swooped and began attacking them, they said.
"They beat people so badly, I wonder how these people can bear it," said one Rangoon resident who witnessed the scene.
"I saw the security forces arrest about five people on the streets."
The small protest was the first to be held in Rangoon today, as an overwhelming security operation successfully choked off daily rallies that yesterday attracted 10,000 and tens of thousands earlier in the week.
UN secretary general Ban Ki Moon has called on the Burmese Government to commit to a path of peaceful national reconciliation.
Global pressure on the military regime to halt the crackdown on demonstrations has intensified.
Members of the protest movement vowed to come out on the streets again Saturday, despite a three-day offensive by security forces that has left at least 13 dead and hundreds more jailed.
"We are ready to go to town again. We will start it all over again and we are very hopeful that things will become much more intense as the hours go by," one pro-democracy campaigner involved in the protests said.
Dr Gambari's itinerary has not been released, but on previous visits he has met with regime leader Senior General Than Shwe, and once with opposition activist Aung San Suu Kyi, who has been under house arrest for most of the past 18 years.
The United States has urged the country's leaders to let Mr Gambari meet with anyone he wishes, including Aung San Suu Kyi.
Back online
Internet access has been restored to Burma, a day after the main internet link was cut off to stop reports and pictures of a crackdown on pro-democracy demonstrations reaching the outside world.
Internet users inside Burma are now able to see domestic Web pages as well as send e-mails outside the country.
Pictures and video footage sent to the international media by Burmese protesters have fuelled global condemnation of the government's actions.
Earlier, witnesses said soldiers were beating and arresting people found with mobile phones or cameras.
Food aid stalled
Meanwhile the World Food Program is having trouble delivering food to the hundreds of thousands of people it supports in Burma because of the latest unrest.
Program spokesman Greg Barrow says it is now getting very difficult to move food around.
"At the moment, we're trying to feed around half a million [people] and all of them are potentially affected if this goes on for a long time," he said.
"I think you have to realise that when you have a big food assistance operation, there's a long chain of movement going on there, and if one link in that chain is disrupted it has a knock-on effect down the line."
-------------------------------------------------
This is such a terrible situation. Reading articles such as these evoked a lot of strong, emotional feelings. The situation in Burma is terrible, with people coming to such measures to try and combat their government.
"They beat people so badly, I wonder how these people can bear it," said one Rangoon resident who witnessed the scene. - This line is probably the saddest. The way people are being treated in Burma is appauling. It makes me realise how lucky we are to be living in a democracy, and in such a fortunate country as Australia.
One incident of a photographer being shot at point-blank distance was high on the media's agenda. They had direct footage of the incident, which effectively communicated the true magnitude of not only the armed forces, but of the completely biased Burmese media, who inappropriately said that forces were dealing with protesters accordingly.
The second of this article relating to food aid is very disturbing and worrying. The people of Burma are affected on so many levels.
I really hope that peace is restored in Burma, and that negotiations with the UN are definitely underway.
Some interesting links are:
Photos of Burmese Protests
The Telegraph (UK)
Week 9 - Interviewing: A Core Skill + Computer Assisted Reporting
Discussion Questions
1. I think I would run with the original quote. As the text book states, "Tidying' and 'cleaning up' quotes can...have serious legal implications". Who am I to change a direct quote just to suit my story. If anything was to change, it would have to be with the highest level of caution, so as to completely reflect the speaker's intent. I believe that paraphrasing the quote, which would misrepresent the speaker's quote, but bring much larger consequences than running a direct quote which is a little bit ambiguous.
2. No, I do not think it is appropriate for a journalist to intimidate an interviewee with public exposure. "A journalist should remain calm, firm, friendly, respectful, and, most of all, professional". I found the point that explained tactics to use against psychological games to be very interesting. By ignoring them or trying to shift the power balance by employing reasonable tactics, you may be able to gain the information you want, rather than severing all ties with the interviewee and possibly getting into a great deal of trouble.
3. No, it is never appropriate to use personal chemistry. This is completely unethical and inappropriate. If you want to be taken seriously in this field, then you have to act responsibly and professionally.
4. I think, in journalism, it is most important of all to remain completely accurate. This person may take offence to you tampering with their direct quotes. Tidying or cleaning up quotes can (as i've stated before) have serious legal implications. Perhaps you could run a story on this public figure, to provide a more accurate biography of him, otherwise you should may the sound decision to stay away from direct quote tampering.
Computer Assisted Reporting
1. I think that I would choose the stable weekly newspaper. Stability is very important. Once you have put together a impressive portfolio there will always be the chance to move further into the capital cities. At the newspaper, you will be able to develop the skills you need for the workforce. I think this question also depends on what type of journalist you would like to be. If you prefer online journalism, you would choose the online publication, and print, the newspaper. I think tailoring your resume and pursuing jobs that will help carve your way to your desired job is important. Companies are always looking for people who have experience, and at the newspaper job you will be able to gain as much experience as you need before moving on.
2. I would interview the politician through email. It would be better to have a story lacking flare than no story at all. You will be able to use correct direct quotes and will have factual information. I would try to make my questions as well-formed as possible, and ask for detailed answers. Perhaps I could view some media releases or other similar professional media as well.
3. If I was sure that the article had be plagiarised, I was confront the colleage about it, politely asking them to address the situation. I would like to give them to opportunity to run an apology in the newspaper the next day, and to let them tell the chief of staff about the situation. If this person disagreed, I am not sure what further action I would take. It is their credibility and embarassment that is at stake. These questions can only be answered so far in a theoretical way, and practically may be completely different. Loyalty may become an issue, etc.
4. I am unsure of what I would do. On the one hand, I could go meet with this person in the hope of gaining some valuable information, and in the other, I could ring the police and inform them that a wanted criminal has contacted me.
Issues to consider here are: why is this person on the run from the police, should you be meeting a criminal, How did this person get my email address, what value of information could they be holding (if anything at all), why am I meeting them beside a dark lake, etc.
"Just as anyone can put anything on the web, anyone can send an email" (Conley & Lamble, 2006, p. 363). This, apparently, includes wanted criminals.
This is a hard question to answer theoretically.
5. I think looking at the credibility of sources, in this case, is extremely important. Amateur sites may have simply copied a quote from another, while a more credible site will most probably hold the correct information. As stated before, "anyone can put anything on the web" (Conley & Lamble, 2006, p. 363). From there I would most probably conduct more research to try and find the true quote, or to try and find the website of the movie distributor, or something of that nature.
Rabbitohs' pokies plan highlights Govt greed
By Tim Costello
Posted Thu Sep 20, 2007 8:12am AEST Updated Thu Sep 20, 2007 12:28pm AEST
State and Territory governments rake in over $4 billion a year in pokies taxes. (File photo) (AAP: Mick Tsikas)
It is tragically ironic that as South Sydney Leagues Club is looking at scrapping its poker machines, the NSW Government is
considering a move that will further strengthen gambling's grip on the state by allowing pubs to introduce the Keno lottery game.
I believe the proposal by South Sydney Leagues Club's co-owners to remove its 160 poker machines should be applauded. It is a decision that reportedly will cost the club some $7 million in revenue.
Yet the proposal by Russell Crowe and Peter Holmes a Court reflects a club that is truly prepared to listen to the community in which it operates. Further, it reveals an understanding that although pokies offer a short-term revenue boon, their long term cost to the community is devastating.
Poker machines are not popular in the community. In fact, they are hated. A recent Herald Sun survey revealed 84 per cent support for the removal of poker machines in Victoria.
More personally a hotel manager just last week confided in me that he was forever being asked by patrons to borrow $5 or $10 so they could go home and feed their families after losing all they had to the pokies. He said he hated the pokies and what they did to people.
Yet across Australia, states have been too keen to embrace them with open arms.
State and Territory governments rake in over $4 billion a year in pokies taxes. The only exception is Western Australia, which apart from video poker games in Perth's Burswood Casino, is pokies free.
Last year the gaming industry took more than $10 billion out of Australian wallets. And it is those who are least able to afford it who are most impacted.
The Productivity Commission's landmark 1999 report revealed that 42.3 per cent of pokies losses came from problem gamblers. That compared to 5.7 per cent for lotteries. More recent studies have put this at closer to 50 per cent of losses coming off the backs of the vulnerable and addicted.
And in terms of problem gamblers, the numbers are not insignificant. There are at least 220 000 Australians currently struggling with a gambling problem because of the pokies. They make up 80 per cent of all problem gamblers and for each problem gambler the lives of seven others, be they family or friends, are impacted.
It means that close to 2 million Australians are in some way are worse off by the pokies bug. And that doesn't include previous 'generations' of addicts who can no longer be classified as problem gamblers because they have already lost everything and can no longer gamble.
Pokies saturation
To me the decision by Souths' co-owners to draw a line in the sand against pokies is highly significant because of just how embedded pokies are in NSW. The state has more than 95,000 poker machines, which is half of the machines in Australia and almost one tenth of the machines in the world.
When I was asked to address the British House of Lords on this issue recently, they were so staggered by the saturation of poker machines in Australia - and NSW in particular - they thought they had misheard me.
When poker machines were introduced in Victoria in 1992 their impact was immediately felt in the community and there was a backlash.
Yet because NSW has always had machines it is a like a 'frog being boiled alive' - the state's pokies crisis has heated up gradually and to now epidemic proportions. Yet it is still not ringing the alarm bells it should.
And now it appears that the Iemma Government is looking to further tighten gambling's grip on the state by allowing pubs to introduce the Keno lottery game.
It is a tragedy that while some organisations such as Souths League Club appear determined to make the hard decisions to ensure community wellbeing, their Government is again following a well-worn path in opting for revenue over the health of our families and communities.
And this is despite repeated surveys that reveal overwhelming community support for curbing the gaming industry. Even those who work in the clubs and pubs are against pokies. Too often they see first hand the carnage poker machines cause.
Social breakdown
Gambling counsellors - those at the frontline of treating pokies addiction - all too often recount the frightening links between problem gambling and crime, kids going to school hungry, domestic violence, family breakdown and most tragically of all, suicide.
Yet the gaming industry's ability to use its very deep pockets to donate, schmooze, lobby and even employ the services of former State Cabinet Ministers has shielded legislators from the actual community impact and sentiments against the machines.
Kevin Rudd's recent announcement that he will 'declare war' on pokies - a sentiment echoed by Treasurer Peter Costello - is reason for hope.
If the Government and Opposition were serious in attacking the blight of gaming they need to use the Commonwealth's hold on the purse strings through the Grants Commission and other mechanisms to provide a 'carrot and stick' approach for the States on gambling taxes.
It would be better yet if States simply acted in the interests of their community.
The proposal by Souths Leagues Club co-owners represents the kind of courageous, moral decision-making that is required
of both government and business - for the sake of our communities.
----------------------------------------------------------------
Discussion
I agree Tim Costello. Poker machines are terrible devices, and the move by Russell Crowe and Peter Holmes should be applauded. Poker machines have a hugely negative impact on the lives of Australians. I also agree with Costello when he says that this club is truly listening to its community. Although they will suffer a huge financial loss, they know that poker machines are not benefiting the community in any short or long term way. With links to other huge issues such as domestic violence, crime and family breakdown, poker machines should be banned from all pubs and clubs.
The issues raised at state level have been very interesting and insightful in terms of government revenue. Clearly poker machines equal big money. It will be interesting to see how the government deals with this incident, and if further action will be taken by other club owners. I wonder if greed will win out?
Here is a link to a Sydney Morning Herald article discussing the same topic:
SMH Article
Here is the link to a poker machine entitlement form in NSW:
Entitlement Form
1. I think I would run with the original quote. As the text book states, "Tidying' and 'cleaning up' quotes can...have serious legal implications". Who am I to change a direct quote just to suit my story. If anything was to change, it would have to be with the highest level of caution, so as to completely reflect the speaker's intent. I believe that paraphrasing the quote, which would misrepresent the speaker's quote, but bring much larger consequences than running a direct quote which is a little bit ambiguous.
2. No, I do not think it is appropriate for a journalist to intimidate an interviewee with public exposure. "A journalist should remain calm, firm, friendly, respectful, and, most of all, professional". I found the point that explained tactics to use against psychological games to be very interesting. By ignoring them or trying to shift the power balance by employing reasonable tactics, you may be able to gain the information you want, rather than severing all ties with the interviewee and possibly getting into a great deal of trouble.
3. No, it is never appropriate to use personal chemistry. This is completely unethical and inappropriate. If you want to be taken seriously in this field, then you have to act responsibly and professionally.
4. I think, in journalism, it is most important of all to remain completely accurate. This person may take offence to you tampering with their direct quotes. Tidying or cleaning up quotes can (as i've stated before) have serious legal implications. Perhaps you could run a story on this public figure, to provide a more accurate biography of him, otherwise you should may the sound decision to stay away from direct quote tampering.
Computer Assisted Reporting
1. I think that I would choose the stable weekly newspaper. Stability is very important. Once you have put together a impressive portfolio there will always be the chance to move further into the capital cities. At the newspaper, you will be able to develop the skills you need for the workforce. I think this question also depends on what type of journalist you would like to be. If you prefer online journalism, you would choose the online publication, and print, the newspaper. I think tailoring your resume and pursuing jobs that will help carve your way to your desired job is important. Companies are always looking for people who have experience, and at the newspaper job you will be able to gain as much experience as you need before moving on.
2. I would interview the politician through email. It would be better to have a story lacking flare than no story at all. You will be able to use correct direct quotes and will have factual information. I would try to make my questions as well-formed as possible, and ask for detailed answers. Perhaps I could view some media releases or other similar professional media as well.
3. If I was sure that the article had be plagiarised, I was confront the colleage about it, politely asking them to address the situation. I would like to give them to opportunity to run an apology in the newspaper the next day, and to let them tell the chief of staff about the situation. If this person disagreed, I am not sure what further action I would take. It is their credibility and embarassment that is at stake. These questions can only be answered so far in a theoretical way, and practically may be completely different. Loyalty may become an issue, etc.
4. I am unsure of what I would do. On the one hand, I could go meet with this person in the hope of gaining some valuable information, and in the other, I could ring the police and inform them that a wanted criminal has contacted me.
Issues to consider here are: why is this person on the run from the police, should you be meeting a criminal, How did this person get my email address, what value of information could they be holding (if anything at all), why am I meeting them beside a dark lake, etc.
"Just as anyone can put anything on the web, anyone can send an email" (Conley & Lamble, 2006, p. 363). This, apparently, includes wanted criminals.
This is a hard question to answer theoretically.
5. I think looking at the credibility of sources, in this case, is extremely important. Amateur sites may have simply copied a quote from another, while a more credible site will most probably hold the correct information. As stated before, "anyone can put anything on the web" (Conley & Lamble, 2006, p. 363). From there I would most probably conduct more research to try and find the true quote, or to try and find the website of the movie distributor, or something of that nature.
Rabbitohs' pokies plan highlights Govt greed
By Tim Costello
Posted Thu Sep 20, 2007 8:12am AEST Updated Thu Sep 20, 2007 12:28pm AEST
State and Territory governments rake in over $4 billion a year in pokies taxes. (File photo) (AAP: Mick Tsikas)
It is tragically ironic that as South Sydney Leagues Club is looking at scrapping its poker machines, the NSW Government is
considering a move that will further strengthen gambling's grip on the state by allowing pubs to introduce the Keno lottery game.
I believe the proposal by South Sydney Leagues Club's co-owners to remove its 160 poker machines should be applauded. It is a decision that reportedly will cost the club some $7 million in revenue.
Yet the proposal by Russell Crowe and Peter Holmes a Court reflects a club that is truly prepared to listen to the community in which it operates. Further, it reveals an understanding that although pokies offer a short-term revenue boon, their long term cost to the community is devastating.
Poker machines are not popular in the community. In fact, they are hated. A recent Herald Sun survey revealed 84 per cent support for the removal of poker machines in Victoria.
More personally a hotel manager just last week confided in me that he was forever being asked by patrons to borrow $5 or $10 so they could go home and feed their families after losing all they had to the pokies. He said he hated the pokies and what they did to people.
Yet across Australia, states have been too keen to embrace them with open arms.
State and Territory governments rake in over $4 billion a year in pokies taxes. The only exception is Western Australia, which apart from video poker games in Perth's Burswood Casino, is pokies free.
Last year the gaming industry took more than $10 billion out of Australian wallets. And it is those who are least able to afford it who are most impacted.
The Productivity Commission's landmark 1999 report revealed that 42.3 per cent of pokies losses came from problem gamblers. That compared to 5.7 per cent for lotteries. More recent studies have put this at closer to 50 per cent of losses coming off the backs of the vulnerable and addicted.
And in terms of problem gamblers, the numbers are not insignificant. There are at least 220 000 Australians currently struggling with a gambling problem because of the pokies. They make up 80 per cent of all problem gamblers and for each problem gambler the lives of seven others, be they family or friends, are impacted.
It means that close to 2 million Australians are in some way are worse off by the pokies bug. And that doesn't include previous 'generations' of addicts who can no longer be classified as problem gamblers because they have already lost everything and can no longer gamble.
Pokies saturation
To me the decision by Souths' co-owners to draw a line in the sand against pokies is highly significant because of just how embedded pokies are in NSW. The state has more than 95,000 poker machines, which is half of the machines in Australia and almost one tenth of the machines in the world.
When I was asked to address the British House of Lords on this issue recently, they were so staggered by the saturation of poker machines in Australia - and NSW in particular - they thought they had misheard me.
When poker machines were introduced in Victoria in 1992 their impact was immediately felt in the community and there was a backlash.
Yet because NSW has always had machines it is a like a 'frog being boiled alive' - the state's pokies crisis has heated up gradually and to now epidemic proportions. Yet it is still not ringing the alarm bells it should.
And now it appears that the Iemma Government is looking to further tighten gambling's grip on the state by allowing pubs to introduce the Keno lottery game.
It is a tragedy that while some organisations such as Souths League Club appear determined to make the hard decisions to ensure community wellbeing, their Government is again following a well-worn path in opting for revenue over the health of our families and communities.
And this is despite repeated surveys that reveal overwhelming community support for curbing the gaming industry. Even those who work in the clubs and pubs are against pokies. Too often they see first hand the carnage poker machines cause.
Social breakdown
Gambling counsellors - those at the frontline of treating pokies addiction - all too often recount the frightening links between problem gambling and crime, kids going to school hungry, domestic violence, family breakdown and most tragically of all, suicide.
Yet the gaming industry's ability to use its very deep pockets to donate, schmooze, lobby and even employ the services of former State Cabinet Ministers has shielded legislators from the actual community impact and sentiments against the machines.
Kevin Rudd's recent announcement that he will 'declare war' on pokies - a sentiment echoed by Treasurer Peter Costello - is reason for hope.
If the Government and Opposition were serious in attacking the blight of gaming they need to use the Commonwealth's hold on the purse strings through the Grants Commission and other mechanisms to provide a 'carrot and stick' approach for the States on gambling taxes.
It would be better yet if States simply acted in the interests of their community.
The proposal by Souths Leagues Club co-owners represents the kind of courageous, moral decision-making that is required
of both government and business - for the sake of our communities.
----------------------------------------------------------------
Discussion
I agree Tim Costello. Poker machines are terrible devices, and the move by Russell Crowe and Peter Holmes should be applauded. Poker machines have a hugely negative impact on the lives of Australians. I also agree with Costello when he says that this club is truly listening to its community. Although they will suffer a huge financial loss, they know that poker machines are not benefiting the community in any short or long term way. With links to other huge issues such as domestic violence, crime and family breakdown, poker machines should be banned from all pubs and clubs.
The issues raised at state level have been very interesting and insightful in terms of government revenue. Clearly poker machines equal big money. It will be interesting to see how the government deals with this incident, and if further action will be taken by other club owners. I wonder if greed will win out?
Here is a link to a Sydney Morning Herald article discussing the same topic:
SMH Article
Here is the link to a poker machine entitlement form in NSW:
Entitlement Form
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)